From Our Correspondent: Building
a Legacy
Some succeed,
others don't
By ARJUNA RANAWANA
Friday,
February 23, 2001
Many rulers have sought to perpetuate
their legacies by constructing buildings and cities that they
hope will last way beyond their time. From the Mughals of India
to Asia's post-colonial leaders, they have also - either consciously
or unconsciously - imprinted their own personalities on these
enterprises. Take Jawaharlal Nehru, the patrician, highly Westernized,
first prime minister of India. He mooted the idea of Chandigarh,
a planned capital city for Punjab State, shortly after India became
independent. To design it he chose Le Corbusier, the radical French
architect, perhaps with the hope that modernism and Western ideas
would bring order to the chaos of Indian cities.
Fifty years hence, there are
only eight women to every 10 men in Chandigarh because most of
its residents are migrant laborers who haven't brought their wives
into the city. Somehow, the people of surrounding Punjab and Haryana
states don't seem to find it comfortable to live there. Nehru
has passed on, but Chandigarh exists as an example of perhaps
what he tried to do with India - infuse it with some discipline
and method. But India is India, and it can absorb anything and
allow all things, however contradictory, to exist side by side,
as Chandigarh shows.
Islamabad, the planned post-colonial
capital of Pakistan, is concrete proof of how powerful the country's
military has been since the country was created 51 years ago.
The original capital was Karachi, some 1,500 km to the south and
the bustling commercial center. But after the army took power,
the decision was taken in 1958 to build the new administrative
capital at a new location just a handy 25 kilometers from army
HQ in Rawalpindi. Gen. Ayub Khan was the personality behind the
planning and he chose Doxiadis Associates, a Greek firm, to design
Islamabad. Why Greek? Because in searching for an identity for
the new nation, the Pakistanis consider themselves heirs to the
great Indus valley civilizations. And the greatest of the capitals
of the Indus had been in Taxila region. Islamabad is modeled on
the greatest of Taxila's cities, the exquisite ancient Greek metropolis
of Sirkap.
One look at the main complex
dominating the "head" of the city - and where in Sirkap stood
the Palace of the Governor - shows what the power structure in
Pakistan is and has always been. The presidential palace in Islamabad
is situated just above same complex as the government's administrative
center, parliament and the senate. The president in independent
Pakistan has always been either a military chief or a civillian
who was backed by the military. So Ayub's plan reflects the reality
of power in Pakistan - the military calls the shots. After democracy
was restored in 1989, plans were made to build an official residence
for the prime minister. It was the now-exiled Nawaz Sharif who
lopped off the top of a nearby hill and built the elaborate prime
minister's home. Elevation-wise, it is on the same level as the
president's but buildings alone cannot change reality. However
Gen. Pervez Musharaff, who overthrew Sharif in a military coup,
is not occupying the presidential palace. He hasn't even moved
to Islamabad and exercises power from the army chief's residence
in Rawalpindi.
In the boom years of the early
1980s, Sri Lanka too built a new administrative capital adjacent
to the colonial capital Colombo. With the unwieldy title of Sri
Jayawardhanapura Kotte, it has as its center piece, the new parliament.
More than eight years old, the parliament is on an island on a
man-made lake. Designed by the brilliant Sri Lankan architect
Geoffery Bawa, it resembles the palaces of ancient Sri Lankan
kings. The ruler of Sri Lanka at that time was the autocratic
President Junius Jayewardene - a somewhat detached person who
considered himself the direct political descendent of the ancient
kings. So no wonder the new parliament at Sri Jayawardhanapura
Kotte has set itself a distance from the land.
Asia's newest showpiece is the
$8.1 billion, high-tech city of Putrajaya, in Malaysia, which
officially became an independent Federal Territory on Feb. 1.
The new administrative capital is the brainchild of long-ruling
prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. In keeping with his desire to
bring Malaysia into the Internet age, every house and building
in Putrajaya has high-speech optical connections. It has an advanced
"intelligent" hospital from where doctors can consult experts
around the country via the Net, and "smart" schools where all
students will have access to computers. In addition, the use of
artificial wetlands aims to keep the city's water free of pollutants.
Putrajaya also has a circular traffic plan and a unique, specially
designed command and control system that is designed to avoid
Asia's No. 1 curse: the traffic jam.
Disinclined to create a personality
cult, Mahathir named the city after Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra,
the country's first prime minister. But Mahathir's personality
has been unmistakably stamped on the city. The biggest building
is the prime minister's department, which is at the center of
everything. A six-storied granite structure the size of several
city blocks, with green windows topped with a green dome, it dominates
the city in the same way that Mahathir has exercised a supreme
influence over his country since he became prime minister two
decades ago.
These post-colonial heads of
government will have left at least some concrete examples of their
work - and their personalities. Sri Lanka's current president,
Chandrika Kumaratunga, who has been the country's executive head
for seven years, harbors the same aspirations. Time and time again,
she has held competitions among architects to design various buildings
which she hopes will be a lasting reminder of her rule. But the
beleaguered president, whose country is devastated by war, has
not been able to get any of these projects going. At a time when
her ability to govern has even been questioned by Sri Lanka's
primary donor countries, Kumaratunga faces the possibility that
her rule will be marked by her inability to build anything.
|